Weekly Euro :- You won the match against the best Czech chessplayer, David
Navara, convincingly with 5. 5- 2 .5 points. Your opponent managed to win only
the last game. How would you characterize grandmaster Navara. How does he play
chess?
Vladimir Kramnik :-
David is a very strong grandmaster. In general he
plays well - his strongest weapon is a very fast calculation of variations. I
noticed already during our first game at the Wijk aan Zee tournament last
January that he calculates incredibly quickly. Fast calculations are extremely
important in rapid chess, there is no time for calmly contemplating a position.
I had to bear in mind that last year he managed to win the very strong rapid
chess tournament in Germany, Mainz.
David calculates incredibly quickly
It is interesting, David is normally very modest and shy, but at the
chessboard he is a very confident and tough player. I think he only lacks
experiences competing against the very top players. He needs to learn what is it
like to play the real top grandmasters. I myself went through something similar
when I played my first games against Kasparov and Karpov. It was at that time
that I learnt the difference between competing against players from the top ten
or twenty, and to compete against the world number one or two. Positions which I
considered to be winning all of the sudden were not. They kept putting up
resistance, they were able to find new resources to defend in those unfavourable
positions.
You need to adapt to playing against the very top players - there is so much
more tension and resistance. Maybe you think that the difference between me and
some other grandmaster with an Elo rating of 2700 is not that great. However
there is a difference, perhaps not dramatic, but a significant one. You need to
adapt to that level, and I could see that David was adapting quickly. E ach day
he played better then the previous one. He needs to play more often with the
very best players in the world.
There is so much more tension and resistance playing top chess players
Weekly Euro :- How would you evaluate
the match?
Vladimir Kramnik :-
In general I was very satisfied, especially with
the fact that in each game we fought to the very end. That was what I wanted. I
wanted to play games, where there will be tension till the very end. It was a
good training for me, which will help me during another chess match that is
ahead of me this year. And I believe that it was a useful experience for David
too. I hope he learnt something from it.
tension + hard fought games are good training for me
Weekly Euro:- You mentioned your first games against Karpov and Kasparov and
difficulties you had to face during those games. I remember photos of their
mutual matches or of their other games with strong opponents. I was surprised
that on those snapshots they would stare at their opponents intensively, right
into their eyes. In nature this is considered to be clearly aggressive behaviour.
If you, from a short distance, stare to the eyes of a dog, the animal will take
it is as an attack. Among human beings staring is considered at least improper.
Was this a typical weapon of Soviet chess players? Have you, too, experienced
something similar with Karpov or Kasparov?
Vladimir Kramnik :-
I can talk more about Kasparov, against whom I had
played considerably more games. In his case I can confirm your theory. Sometimes
he would stare into my eyes during a game, or make some grimaces. I sensed that
he always tried to employ those sorts of methods, and his opponents usually felt
very uncomfortable. However I never took much notice of it. Part of my
preparation for the World Champion match against Kasparov was to be ready for
his off- board tactics. I did not to react to them at all. Once you start
thinking about these things during the game, even analysing them, you’re caught
.
He stared into my eyes or made some grimaces, Kasparov employ those sorts of
methods.
Weekly Euro :- Sure it must
affect some opponents, otherwise why would some grandmasters use it?
Vladimir Kramnik :-
Yes, no doubt. Look at the catastrophic record
Vishy Anand has against Garry Kasparov. Kasparov managed to beat him almost
everywhere they played, even though Vishy Anand has belonged to the absolute top
players in the world for fifteen years. This difference cannot be explained
purely in chess terms, there must have been some psychology.
staring into eyes or grimaces affected Vishy against Kasparov.
Weekly Euro :- Have you ever used similar tricks against your opponents
yourself? You’re going to compete against Vishy Anand this autumn for the world
champion title...
Vladimir Kramnik :- No, never. When I play chess, then I play it
exclusively on the board. I have nothing personal against my opponent. We only
compete by making better moves with pieces on sixty-four squares. I do not try
to look over-confident, make a severe face or to stare at my opponent. This sort
of psychological intimidation is not for me.
I do not make
a severe face or stare at my opponent
Weekly Euro :- Do you think that Karpov and Kasparov were educated for this
kind of psychological intimidation by their trainers? Wasn’t it a part of the
preparation at the famous Botvinnik school of chess?
Vladimir Kramnik :-
Possibly. I know that Botvinnik really believed in
that kind of stuff. He paid lot of attention to those small things, he believed
that such psychological details can be a great help during games.
Botvinnik
really believed in that kind of stuff